The misguided quest to remake women will backfire
Why, if “scientists don’t yet know,” should this “tinkering” with procreation be done?

Why, if “scientists don’t yet know,” should this “tinkering” with procreation be done?
A given individual, whether human or dinosaur, just is male or female.
The First Amendment guarantees the “free exercise” of religion. It’s essential to understand what exactly that entails.
Children challenge the secular, hyper-individualist worldview to its core.
Dawkins is known for calling belief in God a “delusion.” But watching this exchange, one wonders how he feels about actual delusions being unleashed on a society that has largely rejected God.
As the West loses touch with this God, it will also lose grasp on the concept of human rights.
Of course, this reveals as much about the rest of the progressive agenda as it does about “reproductive rights.” Immigration and the southern border? Ukraine and Israel? Housing prices? Inflation? LGBTQ issues? The mental health crisis? These pressing issues are political liabilities for the president right now, so all the attention is on abortion.
If the press wants to keep giving home schooling the nuclear power treatment, they should also develop some curiosity about why so many parents are choosing, often at great sacrifice, to take their children’s education back into their own hands.
Scientists trying to turn evolution into a theory of everything might expect nature to answer, “I am who I am.” But there’s only One who can truly say that. Why not give Him credit for a change?
We are witnessing the domination of a life-script in which children feel superfluous.