Christian faith is not conditional upon human validation
The validity of Christian faith or any other truth claim is neither affirmed nor denied on the basis of who endorses it.

The validity of Christian faith or any other truth claim is neither affirmed nor denied on the basis of who endorses it.
Why are people of higher learning increasingly believing in “a supernatural power” to explain what seems naturally unexplainable?
I think it’s in every inquirer’s best interest that the term “skepticism” be replaced with “curiosity” in order to engender deeper thinking and fruitful discussion.
The changing world of 2025 and beyond will arrive with unnerving challenges for Christians.
What is the point of deconstructing something? Is it to dissect and segment its parts for separate evaluation?
I believe there are consequences for the growing cultural trends that seek to make God irrelevant while exploiting His common grace.
The principle of freethinking continues to stress thinking that will consider almost anything except theism.
Should Christians simply stop teaching about sin because it’s perceived as judging others?
The French have contributed so much to Western thought and culture that I would be disappointed if that pitiful opening ceremony is what the world remembers from Paris 2024.
It's been 2,000 years of attempts to relativize Gospel claims, but God’s grace has proven to be efficaciously timeless.