When you or I dole out Christian apologetic claims in a onesie-twosie fashion, thinking it will seal the deal on someone’s salvation, the end result is usually a crash-and-burn situation for us.
The validity of Christian faith or any other truth claim is neither affirmed nor denied on the basis of who endorses it.
Spiritual maturity is your only hedge of protection against false teaching.
The implications of naturalism are truly horrifying. It represents the complete dissolution of all objective meaning, value, purpose, and morality.
For those who read it for the first time, Scripture can come off sounding pretty iffy.
If Jesus didn’t know certain things, maybe He wasn’t God as orthodox Christian doctrine teaches.
While Alex O’Connor is a thoughtful seeker of truth, analyzing his claims against Christianity reveals that his arguments lack historical context.
How do we respond when atheists point to Christian beliefs that they say are scientifically contradicted and cannot be real?
Is Jesus and the writer of Hebrews commending a belief with no reality-based reason or foundation for that conviction?
If Iran’s regime falls in 2025, my dream could become real: to see a vibrant church in every city in Iran, and a Bible in the hands of every Iranian.
